No HICBC reform: a closer look
The 2024 Autumn Budget made headlines for a number of reasons, but behind the flagship announcements was an important confirmation that planned reforms to how families are subject to the child benefit clawback will be scrapped. What’s the full story?
Background
The high-income child benefit charge (HICBC) has been controversial since its introduction. For one thing, it is assessed on the higher earner, irrespective of whether they are the claimant. This has led to a number of instances where couples who don’t necessarily share financial information between them have been hit with unexpected bills and (in some cases penalties). HICBC has also been criticised for unfairly punishing single-income claimants because it only takes into account the higher earner’s income, not total household income.
Example. For 2024/25, A and B claimed child benefit of just over £2,300. B is currently on extended leave and did not work during the year. A is working full time and, with their annual bonus, have exceeded £80,000. HICBC will apply and clawback the £2,300 in full. C and D also claimed the same amount of benefit. However, both worked during 2024/25 earning just under £60,000 each. There will be no clawback, even though as a household their income is £40,000 higher than A and B.
Reform
The previous government acknowledged this problem, and announced that it would consult on how to reform the HICBC rules to base it on household income.
This plan has now been scrapped by the incoming government. Advise clients to review income sharing arrangements, e.g. rental income, savings, profit extraction, to preserve entitlement.
Instead, the government is focusing on improving collection of the charge. Employees subject to the charge will be able to pay it via a PAYE code adjustment instead of needing to complete a tax return from 2025/26. This will remove the risk of failure to notify and late filing penalties being applied for some claimants.
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?