Maximise the benefit of a main residence election
Where multiple properties are used as a home, claiming the correct amount of private residence relief on a sale can be fiddly. Things can be made easier by making a private residence election. How can owners maximise the benefit?
Multiple homes
If a person has more than one property which they occupy as a home at least some of the time, it’s worth considering an election to nominate which counts as their principal private residence (PPR), i.e. their main home, for CGT purposes. In the absence of an election the PPR is determined by where they spend the most time according to the available evidence, but a private residence election to choose their PPR can be made as long as they can demonstrate they use the property as a home.
What is a “residence”?
Remember that mere occupancy is not usually enough to meet HMRC’s criteria for status as a residence. The occupancy must have sufficient quality to constitute a home. A holiday apartment would probably therefore not count, but a residence in the country used at weekends away from a city address probably would.
Time limits and variations
Having established that there are two or more residences (homes), a PPR election can be made. It’s always advisable to make an election to establish one property as a PPR to secure the final nine-month deemed occupancy and to open the possibility of claiming letting relief, if the circumstances are right, in addition to the main private residence relief. Elections must be made within two years of a change in the “combination of residences”, otherwise the opportunity passes.
Once made, a private residence election can be varied at any time by giving notice in writing. It can be backdated for up to two years. For obvious reasons it’s advisable to have the election in favour of the property expected to yield the largest gain, and to vary this to the other property for a short period only, perhaps just before a sale.
Reopening the window
If the two-year window for making an election has passed all is not lost as a new one opens every time there’s a change in the combination of residences. For example, when a further residence is purchased.
A less costly way to reopen an election would be to rent out one of the properties for a short period and then to reoccupy it as a residence. Because the property can’t be used as the owner’s residence while it’s let, the re-occupation counts as a change in combination of residences.
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?