Were coronavirus and childbirth reasonable excuses for lateness?
A company paid its VAT bills late. The director argued that there was a reasonable excuse due to coronavirus, and his partner giving birth. HMRC rejected this, so he appealed to the tax tribunal. What was the outcome?
Hawksmoor Construction Ltd (H), paid its VAT liability for the September 2020 and March 2021 periods late. This triggered a default surcharge notice, and when part of the next quarter’s liability was paid late, HMRC imposed a 5% penalty. The sole director of H tried to appeal against the penalty on the basis that the due date coincided with his absence from work for three weeks. This was due to him and his partner contracting coronavirus and being required to isolate, and also that his partner gave birth during this period.
The First-tier Tribunal rejected the reasonable excuse appeal. It agreed with HMRC that, whilst contracting coronavirus was unfortunate, there should have been provisions in place to ensure deadlines were met in the absence of key staff. It also stated that the birth of a child was not an “unforeseen event”, and observed that H appeared to have collected the VAT from customers but used this to pay business expenses rather than setting it aside to pay HMRC. As a result, the bar to persuade the tribunal was set very high, and H fell short of this.
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?