Tribunal says personal liability notice was valid
The Upper Tribunal recently considered a case where the director of a limited company was issued a notice to make good the company's unpaid NI liabilities following a liquidation. He tried to argue that some of the £300,000 was time barred under statute. What happened?
Mr Wagstaff (W) was the sole director of Warehouse Holdings Ltd (WHL). WHL entered into a creditors’ voluntary liquidation in November 2015. HMRC later issued a personal liability notice (PLN) to W in respect of WHL’s NI liabilities totalling over £300,000 for periods dating back to 2009. W argued that the liabilities were subject to statutory barring, and so the periods prior to six years before the issue of the PLN in March 2019 should be dismissed. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed this, so W appealed to the Upper Tribunal (UT).
A director can be made personally liable for the NI contributions of a company where HMRC considers that the failure to pay is attributable to fraud or neglect of the officers of the company. The Limitation Act 1980 provides that there is a time limit on bringing action to recover sums to six years.
The UT dismissed W’s appeal. It said that it was “well established” that the unsecured liabilities of a company are determined within a liquidation, which commenced in November 2015. The limitation periods ceased to run at that date, so when the PLN was issued the amounts were due in full. W was therefore “liable to pay” within the meaning of the Social Security Administration Act 1992.
This case is a useful reminder that the protection offered by limited liability can be overruled in cases of fraud or (as in this case) negligence on behalf of officers of the company.
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?