Tribunal rejects reliance on adviser as reasonable excuse
A recent First-tier Tribunal decision has confirmed that relying on an accountant does not automatically amount to a reasonable excuse for missing a self-assessment deadline. The case highlights the limits of delegating tax responsibilities. What does this mean in practice?
In the case, the taxpayer argued that their failure to file on time was due to reliance on their adviser, who had been responsible for handling their tax affairs. HMRC rejected this explanation and issued late filing penalties. The tribunal agreed with HMRC. It found that while taxpayers may appoint an agent, responsibility for meeting filing deadlines ultimately remains with the taxpayer. Simply assuming that an adviser will deal with matters is not sufficient to establish a reasonable excuse.
The decision reflects a consistent line in tribunal cases that reliance on a third party will only amount to a reasonable excuse in limited circumstances, such as where the taxpayer has taken reasonable steps to ensure compliance and an unexpected failure occurs. The practical message is clear. Even where an accountant is engaged, you should ensure deadlines are understood and met. Regular communication with advisers and monitoring of filing obligations can help prevent avoidable penalties.
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?