Supplies were VATable, but assessment was out of time
HMRC is notoriously strict on taxpayer deadlines, e.g. when making claims for tax relief. However, it must also follow the rules. In a recent tribunal case, HMRC was told it was too late to collect underpaid VAT of nearly £250,000. What went wrong?
The taxpayer (GG) is a registered nurse, qualified as a prescriber, and sold treatments for skin disorders, mainly ultraviolet. She had exceeded the compulsory registration threshold, but did not register as she believed the treatments were exempt as “medical care”. HMRC disagreed and said they should be standard-rated as the treatments were largely cosmetic. The tribunal agreed with HMRC on balance, and said that the supplies from November 2007 to February 2018 should have been subject to VAT at the standard rate. HMRC had raised an assessment for £212,897.
The problem for HMRC was that it had issued the assessment in March 2021, and the timeframe under s.73 VAT Act 1994 only allows twelve months from the end of the relevant period in these circumstances, namely after sufficient evidence of facts to determine the VAT due are obtained by the officer. HMRC had argued that the submission of a VAT return by GG meant new information, and therefore a later deadline, but the tribunal dismissed this as it was a nil return. The case is a reminder to always check assessments for any tax have been correctly issued within the relevant time limits.
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?