Revised guidance causing problems for LLP members
The guidance relating to the salaried member rules where capital contributions are made has been updated. If you are a member of a limited liability partnership (LLP) you could be affected, so what’s going on?
Generally, members of an LLP are taxed on their profit shares as self-employed income. However, if the “salaried member” anti-avoidance rules bite, the allocation is treated as earnings instead. The rule exists to counter LLPs disguising earnings as profits, which aren’t subject to secondary Class 1 NI. The rules apply to members that are (in HMRC’s view) employees in all but name. Broadly, for the rules to apply, all three of the following conditions must apply:
- Condition A - 80% or more of the remuneration is “disguised salary”, i.e. a fixed amount or variable but without reference to the profits and losses of the LLP.
- Condition B - the member has no significant influence over the LLP.
- Condition C - the member’s capital contribution to the LLP is less than 25% of the disguised salary.
Historically, LLPs have sought to ensure condition C has not been met by having the member make a capital contribution in excess of 25% of the disguised salary. However, the partnership guidance manual at PM259305ff has been updated to make clear that if the main purpose, or a main purpose, of the contribution is to avoid the salaried member rules, it will not be considered a “genuine” contribution and the rules will still apply (subject to the other conditions being met). LLPs will need to be careful when setting the level of disguised salary and capital contributions because, particularly if the contribution is changing annually, HMRC may seek to disregard it in the application of these rules.
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?