HMRC appeals Lineker decision
Several months ago, Gary Lineker celebrated a win over HMRC regarding his tax affairs. However, that was unlikely to be the end of the story. What are the latest developments?
Perhaps unsurprisingly, following HMRC’s loss at the First-tier Tribunal (FTT), it isn’t giving up on its dispute with Gary Lineker (L). It has appealed against the decision made by the First-tier Tribunal in favour of Gary Lineker. The outcome of this case is important for any person considering providing their services through an intermediary where IR35 is in question. The tax involved is around £3.5 million but that’s the tip of the iceberg. Also at stake are fundamental issues regarding the efficacy of the IR35 rules. HMRC’s appeal to the Upper Tribunal was inevitable given that it stands to win even if it loses.
The crux of the dispute is whether the contract for L’s work was between himself alone or on behalf of the partnership with his former wife. If HMRC wins and there’s no appeal from L, it gets the money and may also confirm that the IR35 rules work as intended. Whereas, if it loses it has a case to demand the lost tax from the BBC and BT Sport (although time limits may prevent this) who agree the contracts with L. In case of a loss it’s also likely that the government will act quickly to rewrite the IR35 rules to prevent the loophole uncovered in the FTT. This case is important for both sides and it might yet go to a penalty shoot-out in the Court of Appeal or even the Supreme Court.
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?