Group capital allowances under review
If your company is part of a group, or is connected to other companies, you may receive a letter asking you to check if you have overclaimed capital allowances. Why might this have happened and should you be worried?
The annual investment allowance ( AIA) gives 100% tax relief on qualifying expenditure up to a specific limit (currently £1m), most commonly for plant and machinery. Group companies and those under common control all have to share a single AIA, to prevent abuse of the relief. Additionally, if there is a short or long accounting period, the AIA is apportioned accordingly. These considerations may be overlooked, meaning excess claims can occur, e.g. where two group companies both claim £1m.
If you receive a letter, it does not automatically mean that you have overclaimed. Such large scale campaigns are based on mass data mining, which is far from perfect but gives HMRC a reasonable base with which to identify potential errors. You should firstly check that the correct amount of AIA has been claimed for the accounting period(s) specified in the letter. If you discover a mistake, it should be corrected within 30 days of the date of the letter. However, if the AIA has been claimed correctly, it is still necessary to confirm this to HMRC using the contact details provided in the letter, otherwise an enquiry may be opened.
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?