Government corrects position on AMAPs
In a response to an online petition to increase the approved mileage allowance payment rates, the government made a misleading comment. What happened, and what is the correct position?
Approved mileage allowance payment (AMAP) rates haven’t increased for over twelve years. In that time, the cost of petrol and diesel has increased significantly. The AMAP rates are supposed to cover fuel and an element of wear and tear for business mileage undertaken in an employee’s own vehicle. Critics say that the current rates are no longer enough to reflect the true cost of driving. In particular, organisations that rely on voluntary drivers are saying they are struggling to attract drivers for important tasks, e.g. driving patients to hospital appointments. An electronic petition was submitted urging the government to increase the AMAP rates.
The government’s response intimated that employers could pay employees a rate in excess of the AMAP rates with no tax or NI as long as they have evidence for the actual costs. A ministerial statement later clarified that this only applies to volunteer drivers. To be clear, you should not pay your employees an amount in excess of the AMAP rates if you don’t want any tax or NI to apply. The AMAP rates for cars are 45p for the first 10,000 miles, and 25p thereafter. Motorcycles and bicycles have separate rates of 24p and 20p with no reduction above 10,000 mile. Payments made above these rates will need to be reported on Form P11D, and you will incur Class 1A NI.
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?