Government announces significant climbdown on IHT reforms
The introduction of a £1 million cap on 100% business and agricultural property relief from April 2026 has been criticised particularly heavily by the farming industry. The government has announced a significant watering down of the measure. What’s happening?
The 2024 Autumn Budget announced the end of unlimited 100% agricultural and business property relief (APR/BPR) from April 2026. The plan was to introduce a combined cap of £1m, with any qualifying assets in excess of this to benefit from 50% relief. The announcement was met with outrage from the agricultural community. Tractor protests in Central London have been ongoing periodically ever since. One of the criticisms was that the allowance would not be transferrable between spouses/civil partners if it was unused. The Autumn 2025 Budget back peddled on this and confirmed a transferrable allowance, along the same lines as the existing nil rate bands. However, less than a month later the government has announced a significantly more generous amendment: instead of a £1m allowance, each individual will be entitled to a £2.5m transferrable allowance.
Accompanying the published details was the statement from the Environment Secretary that “We have listened closely to farmers across the country and we are making changes today to protect more ordinary family farms.” This seems rather odd, as the government had 13 months from the original announcement to “listen closely” to farmers (who weren’t exactly being inconspicuous) ahead of the November Budget, and you have to wonder what new feedback became available in the four subsequent weeks. Still, perhaps it’s best not to look a (Christmas) gift horse in the mouth!
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?